
Key Takeaways
- According to the National Association of Landscape Professionals (NALP), the labor shortage in landscaping has not been solved and the industry now faces deeper shortages alongside higher competition for qualified professionals.
- According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2023 Occupational Employment data, the median hourly wage for landscaping and groundskeeping workers in employment services is $16.61, but real estate sector employers pay $18.55, meaning operators competing for workers face meaningful wage variation by sector.
- Lawn care companies that cannot fill crews reliably risk losing recurring accounts, since customers who experience inconsistent service are faster to shop around than those who receive dependable, on-schedule visits.
The landscaping industry is moving into a new phase of labor pressure that goes beyond the familiar complaint of not enough workers. According to the National Association of Landscape Professionals (NALP), the shortage has not been resolved, and conditions are now defined by deepening competition for qualified professionals and growing upward pressure on wages. For lawn care operators running tight crews and full schedules, this is the hiring environment you are actually operating in today.
How bad is the labor shortage for lawn care right now?
According to NALP, the industry is not moving toward resolution. It is moving into a new era. The organization describes conditions as deepening, with higher competition for qualified workers and growing pressure on pay and benefits. Many landscaping businesses have adapted their approach, but the underlying structural problem of not enough workers entering the trade has not changed.
The practical result for most lawn care operators is that the hiring pool is smaller, the workers in it know they have options, and the cost of getting those workers in the door is higher than it was a few years ago. If you are still posting the same job listing at the same pay you used in 2021, you are likely not getting many responses, and the ones you do get may not hold through the first busy week of the season.
For operators who have figured out how to keep crews together through the full season, this environment is actually an advantage. Retention is now a competitive differentiator in a way it simply was not before.
What do wages actually look like across the industry?
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2023 Occupational Employment and Wages report, landscaping and groundskeeping workers employed through employment services earn a median hourly wage of $16.61, while those employed directly in real estate earn $18.55 per hour. That gap matters when you are trying to compete for the same workers against employers in adjacent industries.
These figures are medians, meaning half the market is paying more. If your base rate sits below the regional median for your area, the math is straightforward: you are likely losing candidates before they even start, and you may be losing existing workers who quietly look elsewhere between seasons. A candid conversation with your own crew about where your pay sits relative to what they are being offered elsewhere is worth having before you find out the hard way.
Worth noting: wage data varies significantly by region and sector. A lawn care company in a high-cost metro faces different pressure than one in a rural market. The BLS data gives you a national baseline, but local labor market conditions drive the actual number you need to hit.
Can temporary workers fill the gap when permanent hiring fails?
Temporary staffing has become a more common piece of the answer for landscaping businesses that cannot or will not commit to permanent hires in a volatile season. Industry sources including Total Landscape Care have noted that temporary workers offer flexibility during peak demand without the fixed cost of year-round employment. Staffing firms like Labor Finders specifically serve the landscaping sector, noting that many businesses cannot afford to make a permanent hire only to find that work dries up or a season ends early.
The tradeoff is real, though. Temporary workers often require more supervision, more onboarding time, and may not carry the same familiarity with your routes, equipment, or customers that a returning crew member brings. For routine residential maintenance work, a temp can often be productive quickly. For more complex commercial accounts or properties with specific requirements, the learning curve costs you time and sometimes customer goodwill.
The operators who seem to navigate this best treat temporary staffing as a bridge, not a strategy. They use it to cover peak weeks or fill a sudden gap, while investing the bulk of their energy into keeping the core crew they have already trained. That also connects to how they present themselves to customers. If your team is consistently different every visit, customers notice. And in a market where reviews drive discovery, inconsistency shows up eventually. For a broader look at how customer trust shapes hiring pressure and revenue, see the related coverage on why lawn care customers leave.
Why This Matters for Lawn Care Companies
Labor is the input that determines everything else in this business. You cannot service accounts you cannot staff. You cannot grow routes if your current routes are already stretched. And you cannot win new customers through word of mouth if the crew quality showing up is inconsistent from week to week.
The labor shortage also has a direct effect on your reputation, which in turn affects your visibility. Customers who experience service gaps, late crews, or rotating unfamiliar faces are more likely to leave reviews that mention reliability. Reviews that mention reliability problems signal to potential new customers that the company is not worth the risk. Local search visibility depends heavily on review volume and content, so labor instability can erode your digital presence even when your actual work quality is high. For more on how lawn care operators are managing visibility during a competitive period, the coverage on how Google AI search affects lawn care local visibility is directly relevant.
There is also a pricing dimension here that many operators are underweighting. If your labor costs have gone up and you have not adjusted your rates to match, you are working harder for the same or smaller margins. The operators most at risk right now are those who are fully booked and still not profitable, because the math underneath their pricing was built on a labor cost that no longer exists.
Knowing your current average labor cost per hour, comparing it against BLS regional benchmarks, and then stress-testing what happens to your margins if that number rises another dollar or two gives you the information you need to make a real decision about pricing, hiring, and which accounts are actually worth keeping on the books.
Sources